Diana, Princess of Wales Forum Index
::: powered by Princess-Diana.com :::
Diana, Princess of Wales
A place to have discussions, share information and post pictures about Princess Diana
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Pictures of Dodi

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Diana, Princess of Wales Forum Index -> Princess Diana Pics Princess Diana Pics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Muala
Forum Member
Forum Member


Joined: 17 Feb 2006
Posts: 21
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Fri May 19, 2006 9:15 pm    Post subject: Pictures of Dodi Reply with quote

Do we have some pictures of Dodi Al Fayed ?
Back to top
Muala is offline View user's profile Send private message
db
Forum Member
Forum Member


Joined: 02 Apr 2006
Posts: 24
Location: Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Sat May 20, 2006 12:35 am    Post subject: Photos of Dodi Reply with quote

No, and as sad it was that he was killed, this Forum is about Diana and her loyal followers. I would rather look at photos of Diana any day.

Diane from Canada
Back to top
db is offline View user's profile Send private message
 
Amy
Advanced Member
Advanced Member


Joined: 13 Feb 2006
Posts: 328
Location: UK

PostPosted: Sat May 20, 2006 6:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

yep me too Very Happy
_________________
Diana, Princess of Wales is and always will be The People's Princess.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/QueenOfOurHearts/
Back to top
Amy is offline View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
 
Jamient1410
Advanced Member
Advanced Member


Joined: 05 Mar 2006
Posts: 242
Location: UK

PostPosted: Sat May 20, 2006 9:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Go to the google website and type his name down and then you should get some pictures of him.
Back to top
Jamient1410 is offline View user's profile Send private message
 
cherry1978
Forum Member
Forum Member


Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 12
Location: diyarbakir

PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 6:29 pm    Post subject: princess diana Reply with quote

Diana: Why Did Spies Visit The Morgue?

Flood of fresh evidence extends inquiry by a year By Peter Allen in Paris and Mark Reynolds in London

MI6 AGENTS paid a night visit to the morgue holding Princess Diana's body, new evidence has revealed.
It raises the prospect that the body was examined unofficially after the Paris car crash. The agents also had access to the bodies of Diana's boyfriend Dodi Fayed and driver Henri Paul.
The British investigation into the tragedy is to extend into next year following fresh evidence of a cover-up. It includes the revelation, first disclosed by the Daily Express, that blood samples taken from the body of Paul were tampered with.
Such is the level of concern over the involvement of British spies in the hours after Diana's death that investigators working for Lord Stevens, the former Metropolitan Police Commissioner who is leading the probe, are interviewing MI6 agents who were known to have been operating in the French capital that night.
Having satisfied themselves that the blood said to have come from Paul is not his, the detectives want to know whether the samples were switched deliberately on someone's orders or whether it was a blunder by officials.
Privately, members of the Operation Paget team have voiced their "growing exasperation" at the amount of new evidence they have uncovered, which they believe the French authorities should have dealt with years ago.
A source close to the investigation said: "There is compelling evidence that British agents went to the morgue where all their bodies were kept in the period directly after the crash.
"What needs to be established is whether Paul's blood samples were swapped in the morgue with those of a drunk suicide victim, so as to make it look as though Paul was drunk.
"So much new evidence is being uncovered that those taking part in the investigation now feel sure it will extend well into 2007." The cost of the inquiry has passed GBP 2million - a figure which is certain to double.
The accuracy of all evidence is crucial to the conclusion of the inquiry, which was ordered by the royal coroner two years ago in preparation for an inquest into Diana's death which was - until now - expected this year.
It comes as the French authorities have requested an extension of a deadline forcing them to answer crucial questions about Diana's death before next Monday.
"There is still much work to be done, " said a judicial source in Paris.
The European Court of Human Rights wants to know why it took so long for Diana to reach hospital, why pathologists broke French law by allowing her body to be embalmed - so make making pregnancy tests invalid - and why blood tests on her so-called "drunk driver" have never been verified independently.
Last month Dodi's father Mohamed Al Fayed petitioned the court. His lawyers successfully argued that the deaths were mysterious and that relatives of the deceased had a legal right to a proper investigation.
The ruling calls on the French to answer all questions as "a matter of urgency". Scores of questions have been presented, including which security agencies were operating in Paris on the night of Diana's death on August 31 1997, whether Diana's car been tampered with and why it took so long for the French emergency services to get her to a hospital where she could have received life-saving attention.
An official French inquiry concluded that Paul was drunk and speeding in a car he did not normally drive when he lost control.
The blood tests, allegedly taken from Paul soon after he died, were central to their findings. But Mr Fayed has always claimed that his son and Diana were murdered.
Mr Fayed claims the couple were expecting a baby and were due to marry. The British establishment did not think this acceptable, says Mr Fayed.
Speculation was fuelled by a letter in which Diana said she feared she would die in a car crash.
Lord Stevens, speaking yesterday on the GMTV Sunday Programme, admitted that many of Mr Fayed's claims were being vindicated.
"It is right to say that some of the issues that have been raised by Mr Fayed have been right to be raised, " he said. "We are pursing those. It is a far more complex inquiry than any of us thought." Asked why, Lord Stevens said: "I think it is generally the case of these things, when you actually go into them and look into them in minute detail." He said the inquiries had so far thrown up more questions "to be answered - and that makes it a complex issue".
Lord Stevens was asked whether the results of his inquiry would surprise the public.
He replied: "I have no idea at all, but one thing you can be sure of is that it is a detailed inquiry - the conclusions that we come to and I come to will be based on the evidence."
Top Right. Front page, Daily Express, 30th January
Left. Page 5, Daily Express, 30th January 2006
Back to top
cherry1978 is offline View user's profile Send private message
 
cherry1978
Forum Member
Forum Member


Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 12
Location: diyarbakir

PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 6:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dodi's Final Resting place


Back to top
cherry1978 is offline View user's profile Send private message
 
cherry1978
Forum Member
Forum Member


Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 12
Location: diyarbakir

PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back to top
cherry1978 is offline View user's profile Send private message
 
cherry1978
Forum Member
Forum Member


Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 12
Location: diyarbakir

PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back to top
cherry1978 is offline View user's profile Send private message
 
cherry1978
Forum Member
Forum Member


Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 12
Location: diyarbakir

PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 1:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back to top
cherry1978 is offline View user's profile Send private message
 
cherry1978
Forum Member
Forum Member


Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 12
Location: diyarbakir

PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 2:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote



Last edited by cherry1978 on Tue Aug 08, 2006 2:15 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
cherry1978 is offline View user's profile Send private message
 
cherry1978
Forum Member
Forum Member


Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 12
Location: diyarbakir

PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 2:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MI6 Murdered the People's Princess
Open Letter from Mohammed Al Fayed
Mohammed Al Fayed, www.Mathaba.net

Most people are profoundly shocked, and rightly so, by the idea that Dodi and Diana were murdered. Yet it is my firm belief that Britain's racist establishment found their relationship utterly unacceptable, and so conspired with the intelligence services to have them killed. My repeated appeals for a full public inquiry in Britain into the Paris tragedy have been rejected out of hand by the prime minister, Tony Blair and the home secretary, Jack Straw but I shall never abandon my fight for disclosure of the full facts. The following open letter explains why.
Since the 31st August 1997, the terrible day that my son Dodi and Princess Diana died in Paris, I have tried by all means that I know to get answers to the many questions left hanging in the air. I have been thwarted at every turn. The official French investigation has so far failed to resolve many key questions. The British government still refuses to hold a public inquiry. The intelligence services in France, Britain and the USA have stonewalled – though we know that intelligence services had Diana under surveillance on the fateful night in Paris. And, as we have seen only too clearly following the publication of the book by Trevor Rees-Jones (but one example), there has been a concerted campaign to discredit my attempts to get at the truth.
I know that I am bitterly resented by some members of the British establishment. There are those who cannot accept that an Egyptian from a modest background should have become the owner of Harrods, a shop they considered a part of their heritage. Others reckon me beyond the pale because of my part in revealing corruption in the highest places. For a few, I suspect, it is simply a matter of racism; though they would never dream of saying so in public, they despise foreigners – especially those with crinkly hair and dark skins. Behind the scenes, the extreme right-wing in Britain still wields enormous influence particularly in the press and the corridors of unelected power. In my experience these people are ruthless in their determination and will stop at nothing to achieve their ends.
Certainly my attempts to make progress through the official channels are blocked consistently by a brick wall of silence and secrecy.
When I met Mr Blair in May 1999 at a reception hosted by the Muslim Council, I gave him this paper which set out my concerns and asked for his help, and a copy of this memo which I had given to the Council. I heard nothing. Then my lawyers wrote to him. Again, nothing. The same wall of silence greeted my letters to the Foreign Secretary, the Home Secretary and the Heads of MI5 and MI6. Such silence is rude and discourteous to me personally. I have given 35 years of my life to this country, paying hundreds of millions in taxes and employing tens of thousands of people. I have helped to win British firms overseas contracts worth billions of pounds. After making such a contribution to the country, I think I've earned the right to some answers. But more importantly, the people of Britain deserve answers: Diana was – in Tony Blair's words – "The People's Princess". A blanket refusal to answer legitimate questions can only fuel suspicion of foul play.
These concerns were taken up in Parliament by the Conservative MP Charles Wardle. He did so of his own volition. In an adjournment debate in July 1999 he set out with great force and clarity the many reasons for holding a full inquiry in Britain into the Paris crash, conducted openly for all to see and follow. He requested a formal response from the Home Office; none has been forthcoming.
I have pursued information in the United States under their Freedom of Information Act. The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the National Security Agency (NSA) have confirmed that they hold 39 documents consisting of 1,056 pages of information relating to Diana and Dodi but they refuse to reveal it on the grounds of national security. My American lawyers have been fighting for access to this vital information for the last year. A court in Washington DC has ordered the CIA to hand over the documents, but they have not complied. Recently we sought a subpoena to force the production of the documents – only to have the judge rule that, under the statute which allows subpoenas to be issued in connection with foreign proceedings, he did not have jurisdiction to issue a subpoena against the federal government. We have appealed and hope to get some movement soon, but it is a very slow business.
The attitude of the British government was well-illustrated recently. On 27 February The Sunday Times published an article headlined "Spy agencies listened in on Diana". In this article, "former intelligence officials" confirmed to the newspaper that spy agencies in Britain and America "eavesdropped on Diana". The very next day, in response to my earlier demands for an official statement on this matter, I received a letter from the Treasury Solicitor, categorically denying any such activity by the security services, or those working on their behalf. Given that Diana was mother to the future King, and was often at odds with the Royal Family, it is frankly unbelievable that the security forces were taking no interest in her – but the official line attempts to deny the obvious.
According to Stephen Dorril's newly published history of Britain's overseas intelligence service, "MI6: Fifty Years of Special Operations" (p788):
"... the late Princess of Wales had clearly been under some kind of surveillance, as evidenced by the 1,050-page dossier held by the US National Security Agency detailing private telephone conversations between Diana and American friends intercepted at MI6's request ". (emphasis added)
It is hardly surprising that my efforts to uncover the truth about the Paris crash have made me a lot of enemies. But I have been shocked at the lengths that these people will go to in their attempts to discredit me. The Daily and Sunday Telegraph newspapers, considered by many to be the heart of reactionary opinion in Britain, have mounted an extraordinarily vicious and sustained campaign. Since the crash they have printed a never-ending stream of hostile articles – about 150 in all – accusing me of everything from tax evasion to sexual harassment. Their fellow-travellers, The Daily Mail, The Mail on Sunday and the London Evening Standard have joined in the fun. (For a more detailed account, see Mohamed Al Fayed and the Press). While seeking to portray me as some kind of fantasist, they show no interest themselves in establishing the facts. If they are able to prove me wrong, why don't they do so?
The most recent attack on me was The Daily Telegraph's publication of extracts from the book "The Bodyguard's Story" by Trevor Rees-Jones. This account was, in fact, compiled by a committee and crafted by a ghostwriter. It is based substantially on the recollections of others because Rees-Jones himself has no memory of the crash itself and only partial recall of much else. He has simply been used as a vehicle to sensationalise a book which peddles the lies of those hell-bent on silencing me. And he has clearly forgotten completely about the confidentiality clause in his contract of employment with me.
The motives behind the book are plain: they are to clear Trevor and his friend Kez Wingfield, the other bodyguard that night, of all responsibility for the tragedy and also to get "some recompense for what's happened." Everything in the book is shaped by these twin objectives of shifting the blame and selling the book. Trevor is consistently portrayed as a saint while I am relentlessly cast as the evil genius trying to manipulate his memories to support wild conspiracy theories. It is all rubbish and deeply ironic when it is Trevor and those who collaborated with him who are manipulating the truth for their own ends. Trevor has admitted that they – lawyers included – are all part of the book deal and so will share the profits. Like everyone else, I have the greatest sympathy for Trevor. He went through hell. But I cannot overlook the fact that, on the night, he failed to carry out established security procedures. Had he done so, the couple might be alive today.
Interestingly, the ghostwriter Moira Johnston is best-known for a book on a famous court case concerning so-called "recovered memories." In her third-person narrative, individuals have a startling recall of precisely what they were thinking and saying more than two and a half years ago and, even more remarkable, an exact knowledge of what other people were thinking and saying when key events took place!
Every trick in the book, every tabloid technique known to man, has been employed to fashion a fiction that parades as the truth. I bitterly resent this malicious book and its intrusion on my private family life and security arrangements. I simply cannot understand why I was refused an injunction when Tony Blair was awarded one to stop a book about his family written by a well-intentioned nanny who is a friend of the family! Sometimes the law really is an ass.
The Daily Telegraph and other newspapers have claimed quite wrongly that "The Bodyguard's Story" demolishes many of my theories. In fact, it contains no new information and actually lends weight to my conviction that Henri Paul was not drunk at all. Both Trevor and Kez continue to insist that Paul gave no indication whatsoever of being drunk before he got behind the wheel. They had been with him for extended periods that evening and still maintain that there was nothing in his behaviour or general conduct to suggest that he had been drinking. If this is the case, how then do they account for the inquiry finding that, within three minutes of leaving the hotel, he was more than three times over the drink-drive limit?
The book makes several claims (about the engagement ring and the reported last words of Diana) which are wrong, but otherwise it consists of little more than gossip and innuendo designed to clear the bodyguards of any responsibility for what happened. Despite this, the Establishment has hailed it as a work of great significance. Like the recent revelation that the brother-in-law ofThe Sunday Telegraph editor is a senior MI6 officer , it shows how far the influence of the Establishment extends.
I remain convinced that most fair-minded people believe there was foul play in Paris. Even The Daily Telegraph Home Affairs Editor Philip Johnston was recently forced to acknowledge:
"Since the serialisation began, this newspaper and others connected with the book have been contacted by people who just cannot come to terms with the banal circumstances of the Princess's death. One caller yesterday berated The Daily Telegraph for 'covering up what everyone knows is the truth' ".
Like Trevor Rees-Jones, I too would like to move on and lead a normal life but the Establishment is making that impossible. It is their constant refusal to answer perfectly straightforward questions that drives me on. They should know that the efforts to discredit and destroy me will not succeed and that I will never give up my fight to discover the full facts about the deaths of Dodi and Diana. I am not alone in wanting answers. There is widespread public unease about the circumstances of the tragedy. Very many ordinary people in this country want answers and they deserve them. In my own mind I must be certain that what happened in Paris was truly God's will and not the will of others. I have great faith that God will guide and protect me in my search and I fear no one. I am equally sure that one day the truth will be known.
Back to top
cherry1978 is offline View user's profile Send private message
 
cherry1978
Forum Member
Forum Member


Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 12
Location: diyarbakir

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


Back to top
cherry1978 is offline View user's profile Send private message
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Diana, Princess of Wales Forum Index -> Princess Diana Pics All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Watch Diana-News as an RSS Feed Get the latest news on Diana Forum with RSS Feeds.


Contact | Impressum | RSS Newsfeeds | FAQ | User online | Home | Sitemap | Watch Diana-News as an RSS Feed
Powered by | Princess-Diana.com | Princess-Diana-Pictures.com | Princess-Diana.co.uk
Copyright © 1998 - 2014 Princess-Diana.com. All rights reserved.
phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Deprecated: Function set_magic_quotes_runtime() is deprecated in /www/htdocs/w00668aa/counter/counter.php on line 61

Deprecated: mysql_escape_string(): This function is deprecated; use mysql_real_escape_string() instead. in /www/htdocs/w00668aa/counter/includes/mysql.class.php on line 165

Deprecated: mysql_escape_string(): This function is deprecated; use mysql_real_escape_string() instead. in /www/htdocs/w00668aa/counter/includes/mysql.class.php on line 165

Deprecated: mysql_escape_string(): This function is deprecated; use mysql_real_escape_string() instead. in /www/htdocs/w00668aa/counter/includes/mysql.class.php on line 165

Deprecated: mysql_escape_string(): This function is deprecated; use mysql_real_escape_string() instead. in /www/htdocs/w00668aa/counter/includes/mysql.class.php on line 165

Deprecated: mysql_escape_string(): This function is deprecated; use mysql_real_escape_string() instead. in /www/htdocs/w00668aa/counter/includes/mysql.class.php on line 165

Deprecated: Function set_magic_quotes_runtime() is deprecated in /www/htdocs/w00668aa/counter/counter.php on line 1795